Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | eresopacaso | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Midrange , Golgari Obliterator , Gruul Aggro , Rakdos Aggro , Selesnya Beanstalk , Sultai Beanstalk
Meta Performance Analysis
Heritage Reclamation ranks #165 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 41%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Heritage Reclamation is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 15.50 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Heritage Reclamation has a win rate of 74.4%, making it 0.4% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Heritage Reclamation than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 3 | 5 | 90.6% | 75.9% | +14.8% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 7 | 84.8% | 73.0% | +11.8% |
| Innkeeper's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 2 | 5 | 82.8% | 71.3% | +11.4% |
| Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 3 | 10 | 82.5% | 71.7% | +10.8% |
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 82.8% | 72.0% | +10.7% |
| Maelstrom Pulse | Sorcery | 3 | 7 | 84.8% | 75.1% | +9.7% |
| Hired Claw | Creature — Lizard Mercenary | 1 | 5 | 82.8% | 73.2% | +9.5% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 9 | 82.1% | 73.7% | +8.4% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 10 | 82.1% | 74.2% | +8.0% |
| Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 6 | 84.8% | 77.1% | +7.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 11 | 0.5% | 79.2% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 8 | 0.6% | 67.4% |
| Golgari Midrange | 5 | 0.6% | 64.8% |
| Unknown Archetype | 4 | 1.1% | 6.2% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 2 | 3.0% | 78.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.